Energy storage economic evaluation table

Are energy storage technologies economically viable?

Through a comparative analysis of different energy storage technologies in various time scale scenarios, we identify diverse economically viable options. Sensitivity analysis reveals the possible impact on economic performance under conditions of near-future technological progress.

What are the potential value and development prospects of energy storage technologies?

By means of technical economics, the potential value and development prospects of energy storage technologies can be revealed from the perspective of investors or decision-makers to better facilitate the deployment and progress of energy storage technologies.

Which energy storage technologies are included in the 2020 cost and performance assessment?

The 2020 Cost and Performance Assessment provided installed costs for six energy storage technologies: lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, lead-acid batteries, vanadium redox flow batteries, pumped storage hydro, compressed-air energy storage, and hydrogen energy storage.

How to calculate energy storage investment cost?

In this article, the investment cost of an energy storage system that can be put into commercial use is composed of the power component investment cost, energy storage media investment cost, EPC cost, and BOP cost. The cost of the investment is calculated by the following equation: (1) CAPEX = C P × Cap + C E × Cap × Dur + C EPC + C BOP

How do we predict energy storage cost based on experience rates?

Schmidt et al. established an experience curve data set and analyzed and predicted the energy storage cost based on experience rates by analyzing the cumulative installed nominal capacity and cumulative investment, among others.

Do technological advancements affect the economic performance of energy storage technologies?

Table 3. Case setting. We conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of potential technological advancements on the economic performance of energy storage technologies. Specifically, we varied the cost reduction rate by 10 % to demonstrate the effect of different factors on the economic performance of these technologies.